The vaccinal spike protein is fully capable of entering the bloodstream and circulating in the entire body

Lipid nanoparticles, nucleoside-modified uridine nucleotides (pseudo-uridine copies), the formation of exosomes, exocytosis and ACE2-mediated endocytosis explains the systemic spike protein spread.

There is no more shadow of a doubt that the experimental mRNA vaccines heavily producing and distributing the spike protein throughout the human body have caused unprecedented levels of harm in the world. There can be no more debate, in the sense that the evidence is now concise. The vaccinal spike protein is fully capable of spreading to neighboring cells and tissues, entering and breaking the endothelial barrier area, causing microbursts into major blood vessels and the formation of blood clots and micro clots, and spreading at the systemic level. A recent peer-reviewed study demonstrated that the blood of people who received two doses of the spike protein vaccine contained significant quantities of spike protein for at least 15 days after the administration of the second dose (Fertig et al., 2022). Following the injection of the mRNA encapsulated in a lipid nanoparticle layer, the molecule was found to be distributed from the local area of the deltoid muscle into the lymphatic system prior to the reach of the endothelial barrier and the bloodstream. Likewise, it is very possible that both the encapsulated mRNA copies are packaged into exosomes and transmitted to neighbouring cells, making a spread of the mRNA and of the spike protein at circulatory and systemic levels rather likely. This confirms the findings that hepatic cells underwent LINE-1 Reverse Transcriptase-induced mutations following spike protein vaccination, and this also highly suggests that the oral shedding of spike protein is possible, given that anti-spike protein IgA and IgG antibodies were found in the saliva of all participants in a cohort who received the second dose of the spike protein vaccine. And because it is enough for the bloodstream to carry the spike protein in nearly all important areas of the body within 24 hours, it is also entirely possible for the spike protein and even a number of encapsulated mRNA copies encoding the spike protein to spread to the oral cavity and be transmitted into the saliva of other people, particularly if there is a close relationship between the two persons in cause, and the process of inhalation would often keep the distributed spike proteins still intact.

It is important to note that the speed of blood flow is high enough for substances in the blood to spread in the majority of important body areas within a day, let alone two weeks. Because of this, it is entirely possible and facile for the spike protein to reach and often break through the blood-brain barrier, thereby affecting important neuronal regions severely. This explains the number of people who reported loss of motor coordination, sight and important cognitive abilities following their recent administration of the vaccine. The spike protein was shown to affect also important elements of the environment, including marine life. Likewise, it really seems that the pathogenic protein in cause harms anything it touches, highlighting the evidence that it has unnatural and pronouncedly dangerous origins. As a result, it is critical to address such important concerns with regards to the reckless mass vaccination campaigns that came hand in hand with an unprecedented censorship of real medical solutions that arose during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The argument of the pro-vaccine delusional scientists and journalists is that the spike protein was designed not to enter host cells, but it is important to mention that the translational and post-translational processes of spike protein production and development takes place within the cytosol. As a result, the spike protein of the vaccine can still cause much considerable intracellular harm, not to mention how it is still fully capable of destroying cells from the extracellular matrix. Not to mention also how they were not capable of bringing accurate genotypic studies of the virus and of the spike protein, and that the limitation of conclusive evidence still makes it possible for the vaccine spike protein to often enter host cells and directly harm the cytosolic and nuclear layers of the cells. The mainstream scientific and journalistic communities very likely underestimated the harmful power of the spike protein, just as they failed to address evidence-based concerns regarding the peculiar origins of SARS-CoV-2.

Featured image: By Alexey Solodovnikov (Idea, Producer, CG, Editor), Valeria Arkhipova (Scientific Сonsultant) - Own work. Scientific consultants:Nikitin N.A., Doctor of Biological Sciences, Department of Virology, Faculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University.Borisevich S.S. Candidate of Chemical Sciences, Specialist in Molecular Modeling of Viral Surface Proteins, Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Chemical Physics, Ufa Institute of Chemistry RASArkhipova V.I., specialization in Fundamental and Applied chemistry, senior engineer, RNA Chemistry Laboratory, Institute of chemical biology and fundamental medicine SB RAS, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=104914011